|
The recently passed “Big Beautiful Bill” (BBB) includes a provision creating a so-called “Trump Account” for all U.S. citizens born between 2025 and 2028. Each eligible child will receive a $1,000 contribution from the government, which must be invested in an index fund tracking the broad stock market, such as the S&P 500. These accounts can also be opened for any child under age 18, but they will not receive the $1,000 starting deposit from Uncle Sam. Parents are allowed to contribute up to $5,000 per year on behalf of the child. However, due to the account’s tax treatment, this is unlikely to be a smart financial move. HERE'S HOW THE RULES WORK:
And there’s the catch: the account is never truly tax-free. Withdrawals are either taxed as earned income or taxed at the (currently) lower long-term capital gains rate if used for qualified expenses. This raises an important question: Why would a parent contribute to this account rather than keep the money in a standard taxable investment account, which would almost certainly qualify for long-term capital gains treatment upon sale? Given that the account only offers broad market index funds—already highly tax-efficient investments—there seems to be little incentive to lock up funds in this restrictive account when a parent could instead retain full control and flexibility in a regular brokerage account. A LOOK AT THE NUMBERS Using historical data, the S&P 500 has averaged approximately 10% annual returns over the long term. Adjusting for average annual inflation of roughly 2.5%, the real annual return is closer to 7.5%. Using the compound interest calculator at investor.gov, here’s what happens to the initial $1,000 government contribution:
ONE INTERESTING OPPORTUNITY One provision in the bill does stand out: employers can contribute up to $2,500 per year income tax-free. For self-employed parents, this creates a potential tax planning strategy:
For the right family business situation, this provision could generate significant tax savings, allowing parents to shift income to their child’s account and potentially benefit from the child’s lower tax bracket when withdrawals are made; however, in the end any withdrawal will be subject to income tax as either ordinary income or long-term capital gains at the child’s rate in the year withdrawn. BOTTOM LINE While the initial $1,000 government gift is a nice gesture, parents should think carefully before making additional contributions. The account’s restrictive withdrawal rules and its tax treatment make it far less attractive than a standard taxable investment account. However, self-employed parents may find valuable tax planning opportunities by leveraging the employer contribution provision.
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
August 2025
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed